Why Supreme Court voided Lyon’s election as Bayelsa governor

Coded Steve Data ServicesCONTACT +2347033771701 OR EMAIL ADMIN@360CODED.COM.NG FOR AFFORDABLE MUSIC, VIDEOS PROMOTION AND ADVERTISEMENT

Why Supreme Court voided Lyon’s election as Bayelsa governor 1

The Supreme Court on Thursday voided the election of Bayelsa State Governor-elect, David Lyon, on the grounds that his running mate, Biobarakuma Degi-Eremienyo, presented false personal information to contest the November 16, 2019 governorship election in the state.

A five-man panel of the court led by Justice Mary Peter-Odili, held in a judgment that Degi-Ermienyo, was not qualified to have contested the election with Lyon.

The court therefore affirmed the November 12, 2019 judgment by Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court(FHC), Abuja which disqualified Degi-Eremienyo for submitting forged certificates with multiple names to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

The apex court set aside the judgment of the Court of Appeal on the case, which had reversed the decision of the FHC.

Justice Ejembi Ekwo, who read the apex court lead judgment, held that the deputy governor-elect presented forged certificates to secure clearance for APC deputy governorship ticket.

  Senate urges Federal Government to upgrade Ibadan Airport

Ekwo added that in view of the discrepancies in the names on the certificates submitted by Degi-Eremienyo to INEC, he was not qualified for the election.

The judge noted that it was established from the documents submitted that the deputy governor-elect forged the certificates and fraudulently used different names when it suited him.

He also noted that the deputy governor-elect and the APC did not dispute the affidavit deposed to by the appellant that the multiple names were clearly and fraudulently used in the form CF001 submitted to INEC.

Justice Ekwo, who listed the multiple names on the primary school leaving certificate, General Certificate of Education (GCE), first degree, NYSC discharge certificate and Masters degree, which bore different names, did not take steps to correct the multiple names on the certificates.

The judge held that an affidavit of regularisation of names purportedly tendered by Degi-Eremienyo and published in the Chronicle (which he tendered at the trial court) was a futile attempt to justify the multiplicity of names submitted to INEC and contained on his certificates.

  THANK YOU FOR GIVING US BRILLIANT LAWMAKER LIKE ADEOGUN – GBAJABIAMILA TELLS AKOKO PEOPLE

He held that the primary school certificate obtained in 1976, GCE obtained in 1984, first degree obtained in 1990 and others were a product of forgery and that Degi-Eremienyo violated Section 182 of the Constitution.

Some of the certificates and names are: First School Leaving Certificate in 1976 with the name: Degi Biobaragha; West African Examinations Council General Certificate of Education (GCE) in 1984 in the name of Adegi Biobakumo, and First degree certificate of the Rivers State University of Science and Technology in the mane of Degi Biobarakuma.

Justice Ekwo faulted Degi-Eremienyo’s claim that he regularised the discrepancies in his name by deposing to an affidavit and publishing it in a newspaper and held that he did not comply with the right procedure.

  AMOTEKUN: Malami does not like Southwest – Akinyoye

He then voided the joint ticket of Lyon and Degi-Eremienyo and set aside their participation in the governorship election on the grounds that the deputy governor-elect’s disqualification had affected the joint ticket with which they contested the poll.

He then ordered INEC to withdraw the Certificate of Return issued to the APC candidates as the winners of the election .

The apex court also ordered INEC to issue fresh certificates to the candidates of the party with the next highest votes and with the required constitutional spread of votes in the results of the election, which are the Peoples Democratic Party candidates.

The judge said: “It is nothing new to say that affidavit of change, correction and confirmation of name has to be by Deed Poll and not mere deposition.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply